This was originally posted on my personal blog on December 10, 2016.
I’ve occasionally come across this question online: Should you write your novel and then research (and have to go through and rip up parts of it and do them over), or research first and then write?
I can see the logic in researching first and then writing. But there’s a little problem with that: Me itching to get the story down and dang the plausibility of it! I can go back later and fix things.
That is, in fact, how my rewrite of Unwilling Time-Traveler has been going. I write and research at the same time, then find something in the research that makes me go back and rip up everything, then write again, then stop to research for a while, then stop the research for a while to write again….
The thing is, until I get the story down, and know how I want it to go, how do I know what all I need to research, where to focus my efforts?
And the other thing is that the Muse is there, alive and yelling at me to get to it. If I ignore her, she might leave me, leave my mind a dry and barren land, with no ideas to turn all those research facts into an entertaining story.
I’ll make up my mind to stop the writing and just research, research, research for a while, because I have story difficulties that can only be resolved by knowing historical facts. But then after doing some research, I start to feel like a ripe grape, ready to burst with all those creative juices and ideas.
I suppose this is a good thing: If, after more than a year, you’re still itching to write your story, it must at least be readable when it’s done, I hope? 😀